![]() (1) Use a different browser for sites where you need PasswordBox to log you in If your online life cannot proceed without PasswordBox, you probably need to do one of the following for the time being: ![]() The extension used the old "widget" module to add its button to the tool bar and that module no longer exists in Firefox.Īccording to a user in another thread, McAfee said they are aware and working on an update, but no time frame was given. Hi Verloren, PasswordBox unfortunately was not updated to work with Firefox 40 (its last update was in May). Read this answer in context □ 0 All Replies (2) If something essential is missing, look in these folders: Note: Some plugins may exist only in that old folder. It should automatically connect to your existing settings. (D) Run the installer you downloaded in (A). (32-bit Windows folder names) C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox (64-bit Windows folder names) C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox (Scroll down to your preferred language.) (A) Download a fresh installer for Firefox 38.2.0esr from to a convenient location. Do NOT uninstall Firefox, that's not needed. As described below, this process does not disturb your existing settings. ![]() We use this name, but it's not about removing your settings, it's about making sure the program files are clean (no inconsistent, corrupted, or alien code files). If you decide to try the Extended Support Release (ESR) version of Firefox, here is how I suggest installing it: Upgrade your graphics drivers to use hardware acceleration and WebGL.Firefox has ended support for Windows XP and Vista.How can I block a site that keeps wanting to change my Java?.I cant get a site to populate for a class, even though I set up an exception.I updated to firefox 8 and it says java is iincompatable is there a way to make it compatable?.ANGLE (AMD Radeon R9 200 Series Direct3D11 vs_5_0 ps_5_0) As further reading, you might also want to read this other question (and its answer) which deals with the security of processing passwords in memory in general (not just data binding). That answer helped me understand the dangers of binding passwords, and provided the inspiration for this article. It isn't going to affect the scalability, maintainability, robustness, etc of your application if you make an exception that is rational.īefore ending this article, I would like to thank the person who posted this answer to one of my questions on Stack Overflow. For something as simple as a login window, it's much more practical to just do without MVVM and do everything in the codebehind. ![]() Ultimately they are guidelines, and there are many cases such as this where there are more important things to consider (in this case, security). Secondly, don't be so religious about so-called best practices such as MVVM. And arguably, it doesn't break the MVVM pattern. There are other alternatives you can use, such as passing your entire PasswordBox control as a binding parameter - although this sounds extremely stupid, it's a lot more secure than binding passwords. There are a couple of lessons to take from this.įirst, don't ever bind passwords in WPF. With a program like Snoop, anyone can access passwords that are bound. and as you can see, the PasswordHelper keeps the password exposed in memory so anyone who knows what he's doing can gain access to it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |